Ex Parte Lee - Page 32



                Appeal 2006-2328                                                                                       
                Application 10/131,049                                                                                 
                       synchronous signal and reference vertical synchronous signal would be                           
                       a waste of energy if there is no video signal to be displayed.                                  
                       Analysis                                                                                        
                       We find that Arai discloses "a microcomputer connected to a vertical                            
                synchronous signal terminal, a horizontal/composite synchronous signal                                 
                terminal and a synchronous-on-green terminal of said computer to detect                                
                inputs of said horizontal and vertical synchronous signals from said                                   
                computer," as recited in claim 26, as discussed in connection with the                                 
                "microcomputer" limitation of claim 58.  Arai does not teach that the                                  
                microcomputer generates "reference horizontal and vertical synchronous                                 
                signals when no input is received from [the three input terminals]."                                   
                       Yamagishi provides a general teaching of supplying a replacement                                
                "reference" synchronizing signal (INT. Sync) when a selected synchronizing                             
                signal (Input Sync or EXT. Sync) is detected as missing for the advantage of                           
                allowing subsequent circuit stages to continue to operate.  One of ordinary                            
                skill in the art would have been motivated to look to the art containing                               
                Yamagishi to solve the problem of missing sync signals.  See Cross v.                                  
                Medtronic, 424 F.3d at 1322, 76 USPQ2d at 1684-85 ("Evidence that a                                    
                person of ordinary skill in the art recognized the same problem to be solved as                        
                the inventor and suggested a solution is, at the least, probative of a person of                       
                ordinary skill in the art's willingness to search the prior art in the same field                      
                for a suggestion on how to solve that problem.").  One of ordinary skill in the                        
                art would have been motivated to apply Yamagishi's solution of generating a                            

                                                        - 32 -                                                         



Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013