The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIETRICH CHARISIUS and PETER COAD
____________
Appeal 2006-2496
Application 09/944,696
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 18, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ALLEN R. MACDONALD,
and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 3-17, 28-31 and 38-44. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).
Representative independent claim 3 is reproduced below as best
representative of the disclosed and claimed invention:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013