Ex Parte Charisius et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2006-2496                                                                                   
                Application 09/944,696                                                                             


                       3. A method in a data processing system having versions of a                                
                plan, each reflecting an instance in an edit history, the method comprising                        
                the steps of:                                                                                      
                       storing indications of the versions of the plan; and                                        
                       displaying the versions of the plan in a sequential manner to simulate                      
                animation of the edit history;                                                                     
                       wherein said displaying is visually distinctive as a function of                            
                frequency of change in the edit history.                                                           

                       The following references are relied on by the Examiner:                                     
                Garofalakis    US 5,845,279  Dec. 1, 1998                                                          
                Nauckhoff   US 5,893,128  Apr. 6, 1999                                                             
                Boden   US 5,930,512  Jul. 27, 1999                                                                
                Kumashiro   US 6,240,395 B1  May. 29, 2001                                                         
                                                                       (filed Dec. 10, 1998)                       
                Microsoft ® Word 2000, “About adding comments and keeping track of                                 
                changes”, pp. 1-2 and Fig. 1, 1999                                                                 
                “ls”, <http://polyglotman.sourceforge.net/sgi-ls.1.html>, 2000, pp. 1-7                            

                       Claims 3-17, 28-31 and 38-44 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                 
                § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness, the Examiner combines Boden with                            
                Nauckhoff and Microsoft ® Word 2000 for the first stated rejection of                              
                claims 3-10, 13-15, 28, 38, 41 and 441.  For the second stated rejection of                        
                claims 11, 16, 30, 39 and 42, the Examiner combines Boden, Nauckhoff and                           

                                                                                                                  
                1 Claims 28 and 44 were inadvertently omitted from the statement of the                            
                rejection in the Answer, but were rejected in the body of the rejection.                           
                                                        2                                                          

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013