Ex Parte Tucker et al - Page 1



                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                               
                                     is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                  
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                        Ex parte STEVEN D. TUCKER,                                                 
                                           JASON F. ELSTON, and                                                    
                                            RUSSELL F. JEWETT                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                               Appeal 2006-2501                                                    
                                            Application 10/104,468                                                 
                                            Technology Center 1700                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                      
                                           Decided:  August 30, 2007                                               
                                                 ____________                                                      
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                           
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                              
                Examiner's refusal to allow claims 1 through 5, 8 through 10, 12 through 17,                       
                and 19 through 21.  Claims 6, 7, 11, 18, 22, and 23, the other claims pending                      
                in the above-identified application, stand withdrawn from consideration as                         






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013