Appeal 2006-2501 Application 10/104,468 1) Claims 1 through 4, 9, 16, 17, and 19 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Ekstrand; 2) Claims 8 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the disclosure of Ekstrand; 3) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Ekstrand and Bailey; 4) Claims 1 through 4, 8 through 10, 12 through 17, and 19 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Okumura and Ekstrand; 5) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Okumura, Ekstrand and Bailey; 6) Claims 1 through 4, 8 through 10, 12 through 17, and 19 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takagi and Ekstrand; 7) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Takagi, Ekstrand and Bailey; 8) Claims 1 through 4, 8 through 10, 12 through 17, and 19 through 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Usui and Ekstrand; and 9) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Usui, Ekstrand and Bailey. The Appellants appeal from the Examiner’s decision rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(b) and 103(a). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013