Appeal 2006-2501
Application 10/104,468
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Answer and above, we
also affirm the decision of the Examiner rejecting:
ia) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the
combined disclosures of Ekstrand and Bailey;
iia) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the
combined disclosures of Okumura, Ekstrand and Bailey;
iiia) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the
combined disclosures of Takagi, Ekstrand and Bailey; and
via) Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the
combined disclosures of Usui, Ekstrand and Bailey.
ORDER
The decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
tf/ls
LARRY WILLIAMS
3645 MONTGOMERY DR.
SANTA ROSA, CA 95405-5212
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013