1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication 2 and is not binding precedent of the Board 3 4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 5 ____________________ 6 7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 8 AND INTERFERENCES 9 ____________________ 10 11 Ex parte DAVID A. RUSSO, RYAN R. DIRKX 12 and GLENN P. FLORCZAK 13 ____________________ 14 15 Appeal 2006-2684 16 Reissue Application 08/544,212 17 Patent 5,401,305 18 Technology Center 1700 19 ____________________ 20 21 Appeal 2006-2747 22 Reissue Application 09/287,664 23 Patent 5,401,305 24 Technology Center 1700 25 ____________________ 26 27 Oral Argument: None1 28 Decided: February 8, 2007 29 ____________________ 30 31 Before: BRADLEY R. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge, 32 FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and 33 ALLEN R. MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. 34 35 McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. 36 37 38 DECISION ON APPEALS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134 1 Oral argument was requested in both appeals, but has been waived.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013