Ex Parte RUSSO et al - Page 3

              Appeals 2006-2874 and 2006-2747                                                        
              Applications 08/544,212 and 09/287,664                                                 
              Patent 5,401,305                                                                       
          1         A second rejection is of claims 28-32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                
          2   being unpatentable over the prior art.                                                 
          3                                                                                          
          4                             Real party in interest                                       
          5           The real party in interest is Elf Atochem North America, Inc.                  
          6                                                                                          
          7         B.  Finding of fact on recapture                                                 
          8         The following findings are believed to be supported by a                         
          9   preponderance of the evidence.                                                         
         10                                                                                          
         11                                 The invention                                            
         12         As the specification of the patent sought to be reissued explains,               
         13   the invention relates to compositions of matter for the chemical-vapor                 
         14   deposition (CVD) of coatings at high rates on glass or glass articles to               
         15   provide, among other things, (1) controlled refractive index, (2) improved             
         16   emissivity characteristics, and (3) abrasion resistance.  U.S. Patent                  
         17   5,401,305, col. 1, lines 15-20.  See also col. 4, lines 13-18.                         
         18         Deposition rate is said to be important in the commercial world.                 
         19         According to Appellants, there are many known compositions which                 
         20   can be used in a deposition process, but all known processes are said to               
         21   suffer from one defect or another.  Col. 1, line 21 through col. 2, line 64.           
         22         Further according to Appellants' review of the prior art, we are told            
         23   that it cannot be determined what precursor combinations, if any, can be               
         24   used for continuous deposition, under conditions and at a rate suitable for            
         25   mass production, of mixed metal oxide/silicon oxide films at adequate rates            
         26   from readily available and relatively inexpensive reagents.  Col. 3, line 65           
         27   through col. 4, line 2.                                                                

                                                 3                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013