Ex Parte Hoff - Page 2


               Appeal No. 2006-3118                                                                         
               Application No. 10/144,884                                                                   


               direct imaging, plate changing, and other processing devices can fit around the              
               circumference of the plate cylinder, while the blankets may remain small.                    

                      Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                                      
                      1.  An offset printing press comprising:                                              
                      a first plate cylinder associated with one color having a first plate cylinder        
               circumference,                                                                               
                                                                                                           
                      a first blanket cylinder having a first blanket cylinder circumference, the           
               first plate cylinder circumference being in a N:1 relationship with the first blanket        
               cylinder circumference, N being 2 or greater;                                                
               a second plate cylinder associated with another color having a second                        
               plate cylinder circumference; and                                                            
               a second blanket cylinder having a second blanket cylinder circumference,                    
               the second plate cylinder circumference being in a N:1 relationship with the                 
               second blanket cylinder circumference, N being 2 or greater.                                 

                      The examiner relies on the following references:                                      
               Rieker                    5,353,703                 Oct. 11, 1994                            
               Richards                  6,050,185                 Apr. 18, 2000                            
               Simeth                    6,283,025                 Sept. 4, 2001                            
                                                                                                           
                      The following rejections are on appeal before us:                                     
                      1.  Claims 1, 2, 14-17, and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
               being unpatentable over Richards in view of Rieker.                                          
                      2.  Claims 3-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                       
               unpatentable over Richards in view of Rieker and further in view of Simeth.                  



                                                     2                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013