Ex Parte Spencer et al - Page 2

            Appeal 2007-0082                                                                                 
            Application 10/171,498                                                                           
                   Representative claim 39 reads as follows:                                                 
                   39. Seed of a fertile, transgenic maize plant, said seed comprising a                     
            chromosomally incorporated nucleic acid sequence encoding phosphinothricin                       
            acetyl transferase and capable of being cultivated to produce a transgenic maize                 
            plant having resistance to a herbicide comprising phosphinothricin, said seed                    
            prepared by a process comprising the steps of:                                                   
            (a)  obtaining a parental fertile, transgenic maize plant comprising a                           
            chromosomally incorporated nucleic acid sequence encoding phosphinothricin                       
            acetyl transferase;                                                                              
            (b)  breeding said parental plant with a second fertile maize plant to produce a                 
            plurality of progeny fertile, transgenic maize plants, said progeny maize plants                 
            including plants that express a chromosomally incorporated nucleic acid sequence                 
            encoding phosphinothricin acetyl transferase;                                                    
            (c)  selecting from said progeny maize plants a plant having resistance to a                     
            herbicide comprising phosphinothricin; and                                                       
            (d)  obtaining seed from said selected progeny maize plant.                                      

            Procedural History                                                                               
                   During prosecution the Examiner made reference to a Declaration by Günter                 
            Donn (Final Rej. 10; Br. 11).  This Declaration, however, was not provided to                    
            Appellants (Br. 12).  Accordingly, on March 20, 2007, the Board issued an Order                  
            under CFR 41.50(d) providing Appellants with a copy of the Günter Donn                           
            Declaration and requiring that Appellants' respond to several inquiries based on                 
            this Declaration.  Appellants responded to the Order (Response) on May 29, 2007.                 
                   Claims 20-22 and 25-47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a).  In                         
            Appellants' Reply Brief dated August 29, 2006, Appellants stated that "[t]he appeal              
            of claims 20-22, 25-38 and 46-47 has been withdrawn."  Accordingly, the appeal is                
            DISMISSED with respect to claims 20-22, 25-38, 46, and 47.  This appeal                          
            addresses remaining claims 39-45.                                                                



                                                    - 2 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013