Ex Parte Spencer et al - Page 6

            Appeal 2007-0082                                                                                 
            Application 10/171,498                                                                           
                   The Examiner further finds that                                                           
                   [t]he teachings of Tomes [ ] provide[ ] evidence … that one of                            
                   ordinary skill in the art at the time of the instant invention would have                 
                   had a reasonable expectation of success in making a fertile transgenic                    
                   maize plant that contains a transgene for herbicide resistance. The                       
                   teachings of Strauch [ ] provides evidence that one of ordinary skill in                  
                   the art at the time of the instant invention would have had a                             
                   reasonable expectation of success in producing a transgenic plant                         
                   having resistance to phosphinothricin using a transgene encoding                          
                   phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT).                                                
            (Answer 6).                                                                                      
                   We conclude that the evidence cited by the Examiner establishes a prima                   
            facie case of obviousness.  We find that the disclosures of Tomes and Strauch                    
            provide a reasonable expectation of successfully obtaining a seed of a fertile                   
            transgenic maize plant, the seed comprising a chromosomally incorporated nucleic                 
            acid sequence encoding PAT and capable of being cultivated to produce a                          
            transgenic maize plant having resistance to a herbicide comprising                               
            phosphinothricin, using the transformation methodology described by Tomes..                      
                   Appellants contend that "[t]he references cited by the Examiner are entirely              
            prophetic with regard to a transgenic maize plant" and "[t]he ability to express any             
            gene in transgenic maize plant was therefore absolute speculation  . . . absent the              
            teaching of the current specification" (Reply Br. 4).  Appellants point out that                 
            "Tomes provides herbicide resistant plants, but a review of the application reveals              
            that the working examples involve only maize cultured cells in vitro." (Id.)  Thus,              
            Appellants contend that there was no expectation of successfully obtaining a fertile             
            corn plant and seed based on the teachings of Tomes and Strauch.                                 
                   However, Appellants have presented no evidence showing that one of skill                  
            in the art, presented with Tomes’ teachings, would not have had a reasonable                     
            expectation of successfully using Tomes’ methodology to obtain a fertile,                        

                                                    - 6 -                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013