Ex Parte Hubacek et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-0127                                                                              
                Application 09/749,916                                                                        

           1          The Appellants disclose as their invention a low-resistivity silicon                    
           2    electrode to be used in a plasma reaction chamber.  (Specification, p. 3, ll. 9-              
           3    10).                                                                                          
           4          The broadest independent claim under appeal reads as follows:                           
           5                 1.  A low resistivity silicon electrode adapted to be mounted in                 
           6                 a plasma reaction chamber including a confinement ring which                     
           7                 is used in semiconductor substrate processing, comprising:                       
           8                       a silicon electrode comprising a showerhead electrode                      
           9                 having a plurality of gas outlets arranged to distribute process                 
          10                 gas in the plasma reaction chamber during use of the                             
          11                 showerhead electrode, the electrode having a thickness of about                  
          12                 0.25 inch to 0.5 inch and an electrical resistivity of about 0.005               
          13                 to 0.1 ohm-cm, the electrode having an RF driven or electrically                 
          14                 grounded surface on one side thereof, the surface being exposed                  
          15                 to plasma in the plasma reaction chamber during use of the                       
          16                 electrode.                                                                       
          17                                                                                                  
          18          The prior art references relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the                   
          19    claims on appeal are:                                                                         
          20          Saito     US 5,993,597 Nov. 30, 1999                                                    
          21          Uwai     US 5,993,596 Nov. 30, 1999                                                     
          22          Degner    US 5,074,456 Dec. 24, 1991                                                    
          23          Murai     JP 02-20018  Jan. 23, 1990                                                    
          24                                                                                                  
          25          The rejections under review in this appeal are as follows.                              
          26          Claims 1, 4-10, 30, 38, 39, and 41 stand rejected under 35 U. S. C.                     
          27    §103(a) over Degner in view of Murai.                                                         
          28          Claims 3, 21, 25, 27, 31, 33-37, and 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          29    §103(a) over Degner in view of Murai and Saito.                                               



                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013