Appeal 2007-0370
Application 09/951,560
1
2 003. Claim 3 on appeal reads as follows:
3 3. The system of claim 2, further including a plurality of state-run or
4 state-controlled motor vehicle departments or facilities (37), and
5 wherein each of said state-run or state-controlled motor vehicle
6 departments includes a receiver for receiving signals from satellites.
7
8 004. Claim 4 on appeal reads as follows:
9 4. The system of claim 3, wherein each of the state-run or state-
10 controlled motor vehicle departments or facilities includes means for
11 receiving signals from satellites indicative of a vehicle exceeding the
12 speed limit, and means for issuing a speeding ticket to an operator or
13 owner of the vehicle indicated to have exceeded the speed limit.
14
15 005. Claim 5 on appeal reads as follows:
16 5. The system of claim 3, further comprising delay means in the
17 vehicle, said delay means providing a predetermined amount of time
18 to an operator of the vehicle to stop exceeding the speed limit before
19 the violation signal is transmitted via said transmitter of the vehicle,
20 so that if the vehicle operator stops speeding within the predetermined
21 amount of time defined by said delay means, then no violation signal
22 is transmitted and no ticket will issue for speeding which took place
23 within the predetermined amount of time.
24
25 Findings of fact 006, 007, and 011 are intentionally omitted.
26
27 008. Claim 8 on appeal reads as follows:
28 8. The system of claim 5, wherein said controller includes means for
29 instructing said transmitter to transmit the violation signal only when
30 exceeding of the speed limit by the vehicle continues entirely through
31 and beyond the predetermined amount of time defined by said delay
32 means.
33
34 009. Claim 9 on appeal reads as follows:
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013