1 The opinion in support of the decision being
2 entered today was not written for publication
3 and is not binding precedent of the Board.
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
8 _____________
9
10 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
11 AND INTERFERENCES
12 _____________
13
14 Ex parte TIMOTHY G. OFFERLE,
15 CRAIG H. STEPHAN and GREGORY P. BROWN
16 _____________
17
18 Appeal 2007-0677
19 Application 10/708,677
20 Technology Center 3600
21 ______________
22
23 Decided: March 22, 2007
24 _______________
25
26 Before TERRY J. OWENS, STUART S. LEVY, and ROBERT E. NAPPI,
27 Administrative Patent Judges.
28
29 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
30
31
32 DECISION ON APPEAL
33
34 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) of the final
35 rejection of claims 1 through 30. For the reasons stated infra we will not
36 sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
37
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013