Appeal 2007-0677
Application 10/708,677
1 CONCLUSION
2
3 We consider the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 30 under 35
4 U.S.C. § 103(a) to be in error as we do not find that the combination of the
5 combination of Deng or Gerum with Mizusawa teach or suggest the
6 limitations in independent claims 1, 12, and 21. The Examiner has not
7 asserted, nor do we find that Hrazdera or Yoshioka, the references applied
8 against claims 5 through 10, 18 and 28, make up for the noted deficiencies in
9 the rejection of independent claims 1, 12 and 21. Accordingly we will not
10 sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a) of claims 1
11 through 30.
12 ORDER
13
14 For the forgoing reasons, we will not sustain the Examiner’s
15 rejections, under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The decision of the Examiner is reversed.
16
17 REVERSED
18
19
20
21
22 vsh
23
24
25 ARTZ & ARTZ, P.C.
26 28333 TELEGRAPH ROAD,
27 SUITE 250
28 SOUTHFIELD MI 48034
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013