The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN FREDERICK ACKERMAN, BANGALORE ASWATHA NAGARAJ, and BRETT ALLEN BOUTWELL ____________ Appeal 2007-0687 Application 10/797,422 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: July 18, 2007 ____________ Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, and SALLY G. LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL 1 A. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 2 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2006) from a final rejection 3 of claims 17-30 and 32-38, all of the claims pending in the application. We 4 have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2006).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013