Appeal 2007-0761
Application 09/907,610
rejection based on both Kennelly and Sameth, with due recitation of the
motivation to combine the references.
The issue of non-functional descriptive material was not raised by the
Appellants or the Examiner, and is not necessary for a resolution of the issue
in this appeal. However, we note that the nature of the icons indicating the
selected language is highly suggestive of that doctrine of law.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Based on the findings of facts and analysis above, we conclude that
the Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1 to 24. The rejection of those
claims is affirmed, under their respective statutory bases.
DECISION
The Examiner's rejection of claims 1 to 24 is Affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013