Ex Parte Massaro et al - Page 10

              Appeal 2007-0852                                                                                         
              Application 09/919,195                                                                                   
                    While Appellants rely on a specific structure in the Specification, the only                       
              structure present in the Specification is found on pages 15-16, (Br. 10-11.).  The                       
              compound described on pages 15-16 of the Specification is stated as having                               
              "RARβ agonist activity."1  Appellants have provided a specific definition of the                         
              term "antagonist" in the Specification and have not indicated how the compound                           
              described in the Specification at pages 15-16 as an "agonist" meets the definition                       
              of "antagonist", as claimed.                                                                             
                    While Appellants argue that the Specification discloses assays by which the                        
              specific RAR modulating activity of a compound can be routinely determined, we                           
              find it would require undue experimentation to determine which compounds                                 
              possess the claimed characteristics of an antagonist as defined throughout the                           
              Specification.  The claimed antagonist must be a retinoid receptor ligand that will                      
              inhibit the activation of transcription by the retinoid receptor at a gene having an                     
              appropriate retinoid receptor response element in the presence of an agonist of the                      
              retinoid receptor.  In addition the antagonist must be a compound having a                               
              disassociation constant (KD) (the ligand concentration at which 50% of the RAR                           
              receptors are complexed with the ligand) at an RAR receptor at least 10 times                            
              greater than the KD for the binding of the same ligand to an RXR receptor                                
              (Specification 5). The antagonist must be selected so that it is not specific to at                      
              least one other RAR receptor subtype.  Since Appellants have described no                                
              compounds having the claimed antagonist activity, it would require undue                                 
              experimentation to discern them.                                                                         

                                                                                                                      
              1 We note that the Examiner states that the only compounds which “fit within the bounds of the           
              instant claim 13 are the compounds/method of the US Patent #6,303,648” (Answer 5).  This                 
              application is a continuation of the cited patent.  The compound is described in this patent             
              application as an agonist (Spec. 15-16), not as an antagonist as claimed.                                

                                                        - 10 -                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013