The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte BEVERLY RICHARD __________ Appeal 2007-0876 Application 10/057,346 Technology Center 1700 __________ Decided: May 29, 2007 __________ Before DONALD E. ADAMS, ERIC GRIMES, and LORA M. GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involving claims to antibacterial toilet tissue. The Examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. BACKGROUND The Specification discloses an antibacterial toilet tissue having a plurality of coupled layers (id. at 2; see also Figure 2). The layers include upper, intermediate, and lower planar shaped absorbent members; thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013