Appeal 2007-0876
Application 10/057,346
(McAtee, col. 30, ll. 11-27) on the surface of either layer of a two-layered
apertured personal cleansing article, we agree with the Examiner that
McAtee suggests the desirability of an article meeting all of the structural
requirements of claim 12.
SUMMARY
We agree with the Examiner that McAtee teaches that a product
having all of the limitations of claims 1-12 would be useful as a personal
cleansing article. We therefore affirm the Examiner’s rejection of claims
1-12 as being obvious over McAtee.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.R.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
dm
KENNETH D. BAUGH
2413 Blodgett
Houston TX 77004
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: September 9, 2013