Appeal 2007-0908 Application 10/152,077 second rotational speed at the beginning of the drying step. Moreover, as in claim 1, during an initial portion of the drying step, a drying gas is introduced to the processing chamber while continuing to supply the surface tension reducing agent into the gas atmosphere. The Examiner relied on Bergman's additional teachings of multiple rotating speeds to reject claim 47. (Answer at 5.) Christenson points out that claim 47 requires a first rotating speed during the rinsing step and changing to a second rotating speed during the initial portion of the drying step, when drying gas and STRA gas are added to the processing chamber. (Br. at 15; Reply Br. at 8.) According to Christenson, Bergman's teaching relates only to rotating speeds during a drying process, which Ueno already teaches. (Br. at 15.) Christenson argues that Bergman therefore adds nothing to the teachings of Ueno and Yoneda, and concludes that the Examiner's rejection should be reversed. The Examiner responded that Bergman was relied on for its teachings that faster rotation speeds result in faster drying. (Answer at 9.) We agree with Christenson that Bergman's teachings of changing rotational speeds do not relate rotational speeds during the rinsing step to rotational speeds during the drying process, as required by claim 47. The Examiner has not explained how or why the ordinary worker would have modified Ueno in light of the teachings of Bergman to arrive at the process steps required by claim 47. Accordingly the rejection of claim 47 is REVERSED. 22Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013