Ex Parte Eidson et al - Page 9


             Appeal 2007-1098                                                                                 
             Application 10/026,059                                                                           
         1   electronic component 10 and the metal or ceramic case 14 in Figure 2 or that                     
         2   enclosed space between the electronic component 10 and the metal case 20 in                      
         3   Figure 4.  Accordingly, we interpret “enclosure” to mean an enclosed space.                      
         4   Claim 1 further requires that such an enclosure be surrounded by structure that                  
         5   reduces a thermal drift of the electronic component by increasing a thermal mass                 
         6   of the electronic component.  As we discussed earlier, we interpret this feature of              
         7   the claim as a means-plus-function recitation under 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth                       
         8   paragraph, and the corresponding structure disclosed in the specification is a metal             
         9   case or a ceramic case covering the electronic component and surrounding the                     
        10   enclosure.                                                                                       
        11         Luce discloses an electronic component in the form of a liquid crystal                     
        12   display cell 95 having conductive segmented characters 12 and 14 (Figs. 1 and 2).                
        13   There is an enclosed space under metal can 40 and above the liquid crystal display               
        14   cell 95, which provides protection for the liquid crystal display cell.  The enclosed            
        15   space is surrounded by a metal can 40.  The metal can 40 is the same as or                       
        16   equivalent to applicants’ metal case 14 or 20.  Although Luce’s metal can 40 is                  
        17   sealed to substrate 10 by an electrical insulator 42, it inescapably still acts to               
        18   increase the thermal mass of the electrical component by absorbing heat radiated                 
        19   from the liquid crystal display cell 95 located under the can, as would be                       
        20   recognized by one with ordinary skill in the art.  One with ordinary skill in the art            
        21   also would have recognized that contact through the sealing agent 42 is only one of              
        22   many ways by which heat may be transmitted from Luce’s liquid crystal display                    
        23   cell 95 to the metal can 40.  The applicants’ apparent position in the appeal brief              
        24   that electrical insulator 42 of Luce prevents all heat transmission from display cell            
        25   95 to the metal can 40 is not sensible and is also mere argument of counsel.  No                 
        26   evidence has been submitted to demonstrate that alleged fact.  Attorney argument                 


                                                      9                                                       

Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013