Ex Parte Paulus et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                            Ex parte STEFAN PAULUS,  ALBERT AUBURGER,                                        
                           OSWALD HAINZ,   HELGA  HAINZ,  DIETMAR LANG,                                      
                                   MARTIN PETZ, and  MICHAEL WEBER                                           

                                             Appeal 2007-1104                                                
                                          Application 09/962,697                                             
                                          Technology Center 2800                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: May 23, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON and JEAN R. HOMERE,                                  
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final                            
                Rejection of claims 13 through 15.  Claims 1 through 4, 6 through 9 and 11                   
                have been withdrawn.  Claims 5, 10 and 12 have been canceled. We have                        
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.                                   




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013