The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEFAN PAULUS, ALBERT AUBURGER,
OSWALD HAINZ, HELGA HAINZ, DIETMAR LANG,
MARTIN PETZ, and MICHAEL WEBER
Appeal 2007-1104
Application 09/962,697
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: May 23, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON and JEAN R. HOMERE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 13 through 15. Claims 1 through 4, 6 through 9 and 11
have been withdrawn. Claims 5, 10 and 12 have been canceled. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013