Ex Parte Gutta et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1122                                                                             
                Application 09/966,414                                                                       

                                         STATEMENT OF CASE                                                   
                      Appellants' invention relates to search engines that make                              
                recommendations for a user based on both the user's choices and the choices                  
                of others.  (Specification 1: 12-15.)  In the words of the Appellants:                       
                            The invention provides mechanisms to expand the                                  
                      choices provided by a user's preference profile based on the                           
                      preferences of others, particularly those of users in the same                         
                      household.  Various types of mechanisms for generating and                             
                      refining a selection engine based on positive and/or negative                          
                      examples are known.  One, called a version space algorithm,                            
                      saves two descriptions of all the possible choices available in a                      
                      database (i.e., the "choice space":  (1) a general description that                    
                      is the broadest description of the choice space excludes all                           
                      negative choices and (2) a specialized description that is the                         
                      narrowest description that embraces all positive examples in the                       
                      choice space.  Each time a negative or positive example is                             
                      provided, it is used to alter the specialized or generalized                           
                      description accordingly.                                                               

                (Specification 9: 20 to 10: 11.)                                                             

                      Claims 1 and 9 are exemplary:                                                          
                            1.  A method comprising:                                                         
                            receiving feedback from a first user scoring examples                            
                      falling into various data-classes;                                                     
                            refining a first user profile associated with the first user                     
                      responsively to the feedback; and                                                      
                            modifying the first user profile responsively to data from                       
                      a second user profile associated with a second user such that a                        
                      frequency of recommendations of at least one data-class is                             
                      increased without decreasing a frequency of recommendations                            

                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013