Ex Parte Tilton - Page 2

                Appeal  2007-1168                                                                                
                Application 10/211,407                                                                           
                layers that are bonded together by means of heat or spray adhesive.  The first                   
                layer can be made from a variety of fibers and is usually thicker.  The                          
                second layer is made from meltblown polypropylene fibers.  In a second                           
                embodiment, the meltblown polypropylene fiber layer is sandwiched                                
                between two thicker layers.                                                                      
                       The Examiner relied on the following prior art:                                           
                       Lutzow US 5,466,516            Nov. 14, 1995                                              
                       Sorrick US 5,714,067            Feb. 3, 1998                                              
                       Nissan JP 10-203,268-A           Aug. 4, 1998                                             
                       The Examiner rejected claims 1 and 6–10 as being obvious under                            
                35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over the combined teachings of Lutzow and Sorrick.                            
                       The Examiner also rejected claims 2, 4, 11–15, 19, and 20 as obvious                      
                over the combined teachings of Lutzow, Sorrick, and Nissan.                                      
                B. Issues                                                                                        
                       The dispositive issue in this case is whether the Applicant ("Tilton")                    
                proved that the examiner erred in concluding the claimed subject matter                          
                would have been obvious as a result of improperly combining the references.                      
                C. Findings of Fact                                                                              
                       The following findings of fact and any set out in the Discussion are                      
                supported by a preponderance of the evidence of record.  Any conclusions of                      
                law should be treated as such.                                                                   
                1. Tilton describes his invention generally as a fibrous blanket 10 that is                      
                useful for sound attenuation in a variety of applications.  (Specification at 6.)                
                2. Tilton describes two general embodiments of his invention.                                    


                                                       2                                                         

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013