Appeal 2007-1168 Application 10/211,407 destroyed or damaged during handling prior to and during the lamination process. (Answer at 4.) 45. The Examiner finds that Sorrick describes melt-blown polypropylene layers 0.016 to 0.028 inches thick (i.e., 0.04 to 0.07 cm thick). (Answer at 4, citing Sorrick at 4:8–20.) 46. The Examiner finds further that Sorrick describes meltblown polypropylene layers having a weight of approximately 1.0 ounces per square yard. (Answer at 4.) 47. The Examiner reasons that the ordinary worker would have been motivated to use such a thickness in order to "prevent destruction or damage to the layer during handling of the layer prior to the lamination process." (Answer at 4.) 48. The Examiner also argues that the thickness of the meltblown polypropylene layer would have been recognized as a result-effective variable, and that therefore optimization of the thickness would have involved only routine experimentation. (Answer at 4–5.) 49. According to the Examiner, "[s]ince both references are directed to fibrous laminate structures, the purpose disclosed by Sorrick would have been recognized in the pertinent art of Lutzow." (Answer at 4, emphasis omitted.) Tilton's Argument 50. Tilton argues that the Examiner relies on hindsight for the combination of Lutzow and Sorrick. (Answer at 12.) 11Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013