Ex Parte Tilton - Page 11

                Appeal  2007-1168                                                                                
                Application 10/211,407                                                                           
                destroyed or damaged during handling prior to and during the lamination                          
                process.  (Answer at 4.)                                                                         
                45. The Examiner finds that Sorrick describes melt-blown polypropylene                           
                layers 0.016 to 0.028 inches thick (i.e., 0.04 to 0.07 cm thick).  (Answer at 4,                 
                citing Sorrick at 4:8–20.)                                                                       
                46. The Examiner finds further that Sorrick describes meltblown                                  
                polypropylene layers having a weight of approximately 1.0 ounces per                             
                square yard.  (Answer at 4.)                                                                     
                47. The Examiner reasons that the ordinary worker would have been                                
                motivated to use such a thickness in order to "prevent destruction or damage                     
                to the layer during handling of the layer prior to the lamination process."                      
                (Answer at 4.)                                                                                   
                48. The Examiner also argues that the thickness of the meltblown                                 
                polypropylene layer would have been recognized as a result-effective                             
                variable, and that therefore optimization of the thickness would have                            
                involved only routine experimentation.  (Answer at 4–5.)                                         
                49. According to the Examiner, "[s]ince both references are directed to                          
                fibrous laminate structures, the purpose disclosed by Sorrick would have                         
                been recognized in the pertinent art of Lutzow."  (Answer at 4, emphasis                         
                omitted.)                                                                                        
                                    Tilton's Argument                                                            
                50. Tilton argues that the Examiner relies on hindsight for the                                  
                combination of Lutzow and Sorrick.  (Answer at 12.)                                              



                                                       11                                                        

Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013