Appeal 2007-1355
Application 09/735,499
11, we will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these claims for the same
reasons discussed supra with respect to claim 14 which recites essentially
equivalent limitations to claim 1. We note that claims 3 and 9-11 depend
directly or indirectly from claim 2 that, in turn, depends upon claim 1.
DECISION
We have sustained the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3 and 7-20
but we have reversed the Examiner’s rejection of claims 4-6. Therefore, the
decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-20 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
rwk
DOCKET CLERK
P.O. DRAWER 800889
DALLAS TX 75380
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013