Ex Parte Sheynman et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1415                                                                              
                Application 09/795,704                                                                        
                                                                                                             
                      Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s                             
                rejection of claims 1, 4, 7, 10, 18, 20, 33, 34, and 36.1  Claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 11-             
                17, 19, 21-23, 25, 35, 37, and 38 have been indicated as containing                           
                allowable subject matter (Answer 2) and claims 24, 26-32, and 39 have been                    
                cancelled.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).  We affirm.                          

                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellants invented a mobile station communications system for                          
                supporting packet data and circuit mode services in a cellular telephone                      
                handset.  Specifically, the system includes an interoperability entity that is                
                coupled to a packet stack, a circuit stack, and a router and operating mode                   
                switch for communication therebetween.2  Claim 1 is illustrative:                             
                      1.  A mobile station supporting packet and circuit modes of operation,                  
                comprising:                                                                                   
                      an RF transceiver;                                                                      
                      a router and operating mode switch coupled to the RF transceiver; a                     
                packet stack coupled to the RF transceiver;                                                   
                      a circuit stack coupled to the router and operating mode switch,                        
                      the circuit stack coupled to the RF transceiver, the circuit stack                      
                coupled to the packet stack;                                                                  


                                                                                                             
                1 Appellants did not appeal the Examiner’s rejection of claims 5 and 6.  See                  
                Br. 4 (appealing only the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 4, 7, 10, 18, 20,                 
                33, 34, and 36).  Accordingly, the rejection of claims 5 and 6 is not before                  
                us.                                                                                           
                2 See generally Specification 1:10-15 and 3:22-27.                                            
                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013