Appeal 2007-1415
Application 09/795,704
Examiner’s findings in the Final Rejection and Answer regarding an EGPRS
stack (claim 10), CDMA stack (claims 33 and 34), and the functionality of
the router and interoperability entity of Rydbeck previously discussed and its
collective capability to route messages between Rydbeck’s user interface
and circuit/packet technologies (claim 20). We find the Examiner has
reasonably established a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to
these claims which has not been persuasively rebutted.
The Examiner’s rejection of claims 10, 20, 33, and 34 is therefore
sustained. Likewise, we will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims 18
and 36 which fall with independent claims 10 and 33 respectively.
DECISION
We have sustained the Examiner's rejections with respect to all claims
on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 4, 7, 10,
18, 20, 33, 34, and 36 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013