The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte STUART PACE, MEDI MOSTAFA HAFEZ,
MARIA-LAURA KOSIDOWSKI, ROBERT BARBOUR,
and ALAN MARK SCHILOWITZ1
__________
Appeal 2007-1483
Application 10/344,390
___________
Decided: 27 September 2007
___________
Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, and
JAMES T. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. STATEMENT OF CASE
The Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 11 and 13-29, all of the claims pending in the application. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 The real party in interest is ExxonMobil Research and Engineering
Company.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013