Appeal 2007-1483
Application 10/344,390
Claims 13-29 stand with claim 11.
F. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Appellants have not sustained their burden of showing that the
Examiner erred in rejecting claims 11 and 13-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Waddoups in combination with Lesieur or
Welstand.
The Appellants have not sustained their burden of showing that the
Examiner erred in rejecting claims 11 and 13-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Colclough 579 or Colclough 580 in combination
with Lesieur or Welstand.
G. DECISION
The rejection of claims 11 and 13-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Waddoups in combination with Lesieur or Welstand
is AFFIRMED.
The rejection of claims 11 and 13-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Colclough 579 or Colclough 580 in combination
with Lesieur or Welstand is AFFIRMED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013