Ex Parte Bullied et al - Page 6

               Appeal 2007-1488                                                                       
               Application 10/809,072                                                                 













          1                                                                                           
          2          3. Applicants’ Figure 1 is said to depict an investment casting                  
          3                system 10, wherein relevant reference numerals 28, 30, 32, 34,             
          4                and 36 denote a mold cavity, a grain selector, a seed crystal              
          5                starter cavity, a seed crystal, and a grain selector support,              
          6                respectively.  (Specification, [0023].)                                    
          7                                                                                           
          8          Rejection I: Monte ‘468 or Monte ‘469, Each in View of Burd                      
          9          4. The Examiner found that each of Monte ‘468 and Monte ‘469                     
         10                describes the claimed invention “except that the configuration             
         11                of their grain selector is different from that...claimed.”  (Answer        
         12                3.)                                                                        
         13          5. Applicants do not contest the Examiner’s finding in this regard.              
         14          6. Specifically, the crystal (grain) selector described in Monte                 
         15                ‘468 or Monte ‘469 does not include “a non-linear tubular                  



                                                  6                                                   

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013