Appeal 2007-1942 Application 10/368,975 polyethylene layers that are “symmetrically disposed about” the central aramid layer? IV. Legal Principles Claim Construction We give the claims their broadest reasonable interpretation that is consistent with the specification. Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1316 75 USPQ2d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2005). When a claim uses the transitional phrase "comprising", there is a presumption that additional, unrecited elements are not excluded from the claim. Crystal Semiconductor Corp. v. TriTech Microelectronics Int'l, Inc., 246 F.3d 1336, 1347, 57 USPQ2d 1953, 1958-59 (Fed. Cir. 2001). 35 U.S.C. § 102 “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless …..the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States” 35 U.S.C § 102(b). To anticipate a claim, a prior art reference must disclose every limitation of the claimed invention, either expressly or inherently. Verdegaal Bros. Inc., v. Union Oil Co., 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987). 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) “A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013