Appeal 2007-2218
Application 10/035,595
CONCLUSION OF LAW
(1) Appellant has not established that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claims 1-5 and 7-40 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) over
Huang.
(2) Appellant has not established that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claims 1-5 and 7-40 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Lynch.
(3) Claims 1-5 and 7-40 are not patentable.
DECISION
The Examiner's rejection of claims 1-5 and 7-40 is Affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b)
pgc
SUN MICROSYSTEMS/FINNEGAN, HENDERSON LLP
901 NEW YORK AVENUE, NW
WASHINGTON DC 20001-4413
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013