1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte CELSO LUIS MELLO, JONATHAN SPINELLI,
12 JEFF HASTINGS, EDWARD CURVINO,
13 GERRIT LACHAERT, DAVID LEAH, and GEOFF O. MORRIN
14 ___________
15
16 Appeal 2007-2240
17 Application 09/818,016
18 Technology Center 3600
19 ___________
20
21 Decided: July 17, 2007
22 ___________
23
24 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, STUART S. LEVY, and ANTON W. FETTING,
25 Administrative Patent Judges.
26 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
27 DECISION ON APPEAL
28
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-8, 10, 12-16, 18, and 20,
32 the only claims pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have
33 jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
34
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013