The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte XIAOPING BIAN,
MARY FRANCES DOERNER,
JAMES A. HAGAN, TIM MINVIELLE,
MOHAMMAD TAGHI MIRZAMAANI,
ADAM DANIEL POLCYN and KAI TANG
____________
Appeal 2007-2256
Application 10/903,064
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: July 31, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-7, which are the only claims
pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013