Mardis? - Page 6

               Appeal 2007-2521                                                                           
               Reexamination 90/007,130                                                                   

           1                obtained through an amidation reaction at 150-170°C of a                      
           2                mixture of hydrogenated castor oil fatty acid with C6-C12                     
           3                straight chain saturated fatty acid . . . under addition of an                
           4                equivalent amount of ethylenediamine or 1,4-                                  
           5                diaminobutane . . .                                                           
           6   Yasuda, p. 5, l. 14-18.  Yasuda describes a small genus of diamides that                   
           7   includes species within the scope of Patentees Claim 1.  Thus, Yasuda                      
           8   teaches rheological additives including the reaction product of (a) ethylene               
           9   diamine, (b) hexanoic, heptanoic or octanoic acid (C6, C7 and C8 straight                  
          10   chain fatty acid), and (c) 12-hydroxystearic acid (hydrogenated castor oil)                
          11   made by mixing those components and heating.  Those rheological additives                  
          12   meet every limitation of Patentee’s Claim 1.  Yasuda anticipates the subject               
          13   matter of Claim 1.  Perricone., 432 F.3d at 1367, 77 USPQ2d at 1325.                       
          14         Patentees argue that the products obtained by Yasuda’s technique are                 
          15   different than those claimed.  In particular, they argue that there is a                   
          16   difference in the amount of unreacted acid and amine in the product.  Appeal               
          17   Brief, p. 7.  To support their argument, Patentees present a declaration from              
          18   each of the two named inventors, Mahalingam Santhanam and Wilbur S.                        
          19   Mardis.  Appeal Brief, p. 7.  The Inventors testify that they compared the                 
          20   products said to have been made according to the example on page 9 of                      
          21   Yasuda with products obtained according to Patentee’s invention using the                  
          22   same reactants.  Santhaman Declaration, p. 2, ¶ 5; Mardis Declaration, p. 2,               
          23   ¶ 7.  In that example, in addition to the amine and the acids, 60 grams of                 
          24   xylene are included in the mixture.  Patentees’ comparisons were said to                   
          25   have been done “neat,” i.e, without xylene.  Santhaman Declaration, p. 2,                  
          26   ¶ 5; Mardis Declaration, p. 2-3, ¶ 7.  Both Declarants testify that their                  
          27   technique resulted in a product having significantly less unreacted amine and              


                                                   - 6 -                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013