The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WARREN B. JACKSON
SEAN ZHANG, and CRAIG M. PERLOV
____________
Appeal 2007-2532
Application 10/608,7911
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: August 20, 2007
____________
Before TEDDY S. GRON, MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, and MARK
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
A. Introduction
Applicants ("Jackson") appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1–27 and 322. We have jurisdiction under 35
U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.
1 Application filed 26 June 2003. The real-party-in-interest is listed as
Hewlett-Packard Dev. Co., LP. (Brief filed 1 September 2006 ("Br.") at 2.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013