The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WARREN B. JACKSON SEAN ZHANG, and CRAIG M. PERLOV ____________ Appeal 2007-2532 Application 10/608,7911 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: August 20, 2007 ____________ Before TEDDY S. GRON, MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, and MARK NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL A. Introduction Applicants ("Jackson") appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1–27 and 322. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM. 1 Application filed 26 June 2003. The real-party-in-interest is listed as Hewlett-Packard Dev. Co., LP. (Brief filed 1 September 2006 ("Br.") at 2.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013