Appeal 2007-2742
Application 09/764,618
1 [4] said at least one payment-related activity selected from the group
2 consisting of
3 [a] debiting an electronic auction payment account
4 [i] corresponding to the purchaser of the at least one item
5 and maintained by said electronic auction payment
6 system, and
7 [b] withdrawing funds from at least one account storing funds
8 therein and
9 [i] not corresponding to at least one of the plurality of
10 users; and
11 [5] crediting at least one account
12 [a] corresponding to the seller
13 [b] to effect payment for the at least one item offered for the
14 electronic auction sale via the electronic auction web site.
15
16 This appeal arises from the Examiner’s Final Rejection, mailed May 6, 2005.
17 The Appellants filed an Appeal Brief in support of the appeal on August 14, 2006,
18 and an Examiner’s Answer to the Appeal Brief was mailed on October 11, 2006.
19 PRIOR ART
20 The Examiner relies upon the following prior art:
21 Hambrecht US 6,629,082 B1 Sep. 30, 2003
21 Bogosian
22 US 6,760,470 B1 Jul. 6, 2004
23
24 REJECTIONS
25 Claims 1-31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over
26 Bogosian and Hambrecht.
27
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013