Ira S. Greene and Robin C. Greene - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         
               A graduated addition to tax is imposed when an individual              
          has an underpayment of tax that equals or exceeds $1,000 and "is            
          attributable to" a valuation overstatement.  Sec. 6659(a), (d).             
          A valuation overstatement exists if the fair market value (or               
          adjusted basis) of property claimed on a return equals or exceeds           
          150 percent of the amount determined to be the correct amount.              
          Sec. 6659(c).  If the claimed valuation exceeds 250 percent of              
          the correct value, the addition is equal to 30 percent of the               
          underpayment.  Sec. 6659(b).                                                
               Petitioners claimed tax benefits, including investment tax             
          credits and business energy credits, based on a purported value             
          of $1,162,666 for each Sentinel EPE recycler.  Petitioners                  
          concede that the fair market value of a Sentinel EPE recycler in            
          1981 was not in excess of $50,000.  Therefore, if disallowance of           
          petitioners' claimed tax benefits is attributable to that                   
          valuation overstatement, petitioners are liable for the section             
          6659 addition to tax at the rate of 30 percent of the                       
          underpayment of tax attributable to the tax benefits claimed with           
          respect to Resource.                                                        
               Petitioners contend that section 6659 cannot apply in this             
          case because they conceded the claimed tax benefits relating to             
          Resource.  In the alternative, petitioners contend that                     
          respondent erroneously failed to waive the section 6659 addition            
          to tax.  We reject both of these arguments for reasons set forth            
          below.                                                                      




Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011