United Cancer Council, Inc. - Page 57

                                       - 41 -                                         
          gave instructions as to the mailing list numbers, the copy, the             
          dates of mailing, and the total number of letters to be sent.               
               Petitioner received from W&H a monthly status report of the            
          cumulative costs and revenues of each direct mail package mailing           
          and a proposed schedule of future mailings.  Petitioner was also            
          advised with regard to test mailings, typically of 5,000 letters,           
          that W&H had done of proposed mailing packages.  If a test                  
          mailing was successful, then W&H generally recommended that more            
          mailings of that package be “rolled out” in greater quantities.             
               W&H issued purchase orders on behalf of petitioner with                
          respect to all of the goods, services, and other expenditures               
          required for the various mailings.  This was done on an on-going            
          basis and involved such items as computer work, mailing house               
          expenses, mailing list rentals, and printing.  When petitioner              
          approved the making of a mailing, W&H and petitioner considered             
          petitioner to have authorized W&H to order and arrange for all of           
          the related goods, services, and other expenditures required to             
          effectuate the mailing.                                                     
               Petitioner accrued the amounts shown in table 7 as its                 
          expenses for (1) postage and shipping, (2) printing and                     
          publishing, (3) fundraising fees,10 and (4) mailing list rentals.           

               10   Compare the accruals shown on the fundraising fees                
          column in table 7, with the payments shown supra table 3.  When             
          adjusted for the W&H reimbursements pursuant to the Contract, the           
          net accrual amounts are fairly close to the actual payment                  
          amounts, except for 1986, where the difference is about $275,000.           
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011