United Cancer Council, Inc. - Page 56

                                       - 40 -                                         
          would improve relations with petitioner’s board of directors and            
          increase the likelihood that the Contract would be renewed.                 
               As a result of the addendum provision regarding monthly                
          draws, petitioner received an unqualified opinion for 1986.  That           
          is, the certified public accounting firm’s report no longer                 
          included qualifications or reservations about petitioner’s                  
          practices or potential liabilities.                                         
                    Direct Mail Fundraising Campaign:  1984-1989                      
          A. In General                                                               
               From June 1984 through May 1989, W&H conducted a nationwide            
          direct mail fundraising campaign for petitioner.  Mailings were             
          eventually sent throughout all 50 States.  However, petitioner              
          directed W&H not to make mailings to areas serviced by certain of           
          petitioner’s member agencies, as those member agencies received             
          annual funding from the United Way campaign and a condition of              
          their receipt of such funding was that they not be involved in              
          competing fundraising efforts.                                              
               W&H created and developed direct mail fundraising packages             
          with petitioner’s assistance and input.  Before each direct mail            
          package was mailed, petitioner received from W&H all materials to           
          be included in the package, as well as the names of all mailing             
          lists to which W&H proposed to send the package and the estimated           
          numbers of names from each mailing list to be used in the                   
          mailing.  Petitioner, through its staff and a committee of its              
          board, reviewed and revised the package and the mailing list and            




Page:  Previous  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011