Phillip M. Welch and Dorothy Ellen Welch - Page 14

                                        - 14 -                                         

                  Intangibles. If an intangible asset is known from                    
                  experience or other factors to be of use in the                      
                  business or in the production of income for only                     
                  a limited period, the length of which can be                         
                  estimated with reasonable accuracy, such an                          
                  intangible asset may be the subject of a                             
                  depreciation allowance.  Examples are patents and                    
                  copyrights.  An intangible asset, the useful life                    
                  of which is not limited, is not subject to the                       
                  allowance for depreciation.  No allowance will be                    
                  permitted merely because, in the unsupported                         
                  opinion of the taxpayer, the intangible asset has                    
                  a limited useful life.  No deduction for                             
                  depreciation is allowable with respect to                            
                  goodwill * * *                                                       

             Thus, generally, if an intangible asset is shown to have an               
             ascertainable value and a limited useful life which can be                
             determined with reasonable accuracy, the depreciation                     
             allowance may be utilized.  The "significant question for                 
             purposes of depreciation is * * * whether the asset is                    
             capable of being valued and whether that value diminishes                 
             over time."  Newark Morning Ledger Co. v. United States,                  
             507 U.S. 546, 566 (1993).  Covenants not to compete and                   
             client lists may constitute amortizable intangible assets.                
             See id.; Balthrope v. Commissioner, 356 F.2d 28, 31 (5th                  
             Cir. 1966); O'Dell & Co. v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 461, 466                
             (1974); Wager v. Commissioner, 52 T.C. 416, 419 (1969);                   
             Levinson v. Commissioner, 45 T.C. 380, 389 (1966).  In                    
             passing, we note that for intangibles acquired after                      
             August 10, 1993, section 197 allows a taxpayer to amortize                
             the adjusted basis of the intangibles ratably over a 15-                  




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011