Norwest Corporation and Subsidiaries, Successor in Interest to United Banks of Colorado, Inc., and Subsidiaries, et al. - Page 95

                                        - 95 -                                        
          15 years, and the constituent parts of the NOL are of no importance         
          in determining the business’s eligibility for such treatment.  If           
          the corporation were a commercial bank, however, then, because of           
          section 172(b)(1)(L), the constituent parts of the NOL would be             
          important, because the special period rules of section 172(l) apply         
          only to that portion of the NOL attributable to the deduction               
          allowed by section 166 (the bad debt portion).  In theory, the bad          
          debt portion of the NOL might be determined in a number of ways.  A         
          simple way would be to determine that, since the bad debt deduction         
          of $30 accounted for approximately 27 percent of the total                  
          deductions of $110, 27 percent of the NOL, i.e., $2.70, is the bad          
          debt portion.  Section 172(l)(1) adopts a different rule, one that          
          is favorable to the intended recipients, commercial banks.  Under           
          section 172(l)(1), on the facts of our simple example, if the               
          corporation were a commercial bank, the bad debt portion is $10.            
          The assumption is that deductions for (losses from) bad debts               
          constitute the NOL to the extent of such deductions.                        
               Neither party disagrees that section 172(l)(1) works as                
          described.  Their disagreement concerns the composition of the              
          consolidated NOL.  Respondent would allocate the consolidated NOL           
          among the loss members of the UBC affiliated group in proportion to         
          each loss member’s share of the aggregate of all loss member’s NOLs         
          and would further allocate each bank loss member’s share of the             
          consolidated NOL between the bad debt portion of the bank member’s          
          NOL and the remainder of the bank loss member’s NOL in proportion           
          to those relative amounts.  Thus, assume that affiliated group ABC,         




Page:  Previous  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011