- 4 -
her monthly income. Any increase in income shall be
grounds for a reevaluation of * * * [petitioner’s]
obligation for support. Further, the termination of
the mutual obligation of spousal support, shall be
further grounds for reevaluation of the support orders.
On September 19, 1990, petitioner and Ms. Wells, through a
Memorandum of Agreement, modified the MTA. The relevant portions
of that agreement (Modified MTA) are set out below:
NOW, THEREFORE, * * * [Ms. Wells and petitioner] do
hereby agree to modify the Marital Termination
Agreement of February 5, 1990, to the extent and only
to the extent as herein detailed. Said order shall be
modified with respect to paragraph numbered (14)
subsection (c) thereof, as follows:
a. * * * [Petitioner] shall pay to * * * [Ms. Wells]
as and for family support order the sum of $2,600.00
per month, payable in the sum of $1,300.00 on the 15th
day of each month and $1,300.00 on the 1st day of each
month, commencing October 15, 1990.
b. That portion of paragraph numbered (14) subsection
(c) of the Marital Termination Agreement above referred
to and which reflects that “one and a half (1 1/2)
months after the sale of the house, the family support
order shall increase to the sum of $3,238.00 per
month.” is hereby, by agreement of the parties,
declared of no force and effect.
* * *
e. * * * [Ms. Wells] agrees to notify * * *
[petitioner] at the commencement of full-time
employment by * * * [Ms. Wells] and to notify * * *
[petitioner] of the name and address of her employer
and her salary structure all at such time as * * * [Ms.
Wells] commences full-time employment.
Petitioner and respondent have stipulated that petitioner
had made the payments at issue pursuant to this Modified MTA.
They also have stipulated these additional facts:
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011