Investment Research Associates - Page 411




                                       - 464 -                                         
          transactions in 1987.  See also Scully v. United States, 840 F.2d            
          478 (7th Cir. 1988).                                                         
               The Court further concludes that Kanter failed to meet his              
          burden of proving that the Kanters are entitled to abandonment               
          losses with respect to the BK Eagle, BK Freedom, and BK Lioness              
          partnership interests.  Kanter generally testified that a number             
          of assets on which the Kanters had claimed capital losses for                
          1987 were essentially worthless.  In our view that is not                    
          sufficient to establish abandonment.  Kanter failed to show (1)              
          an intention on his part to abandon each partnership interest,               
          and (2) an affirmative act of abandonment with respect to each               
          partnership interest.  See Citron v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. at                
          209-213.  Consequently, we sustain respondent's determination                
          that the Kanters are not entitled to loss deductions on these                
          partnership interests for 1987.                                              
               The Court also rejects the alternative contention that the              
          Kanters are entitled to deductions for partial worthlessness of              
          the promissory notes under section 166(a)(2).56  They made no                

          56                                                                           
               Although sec. 166(a)(2) provides that a bad debt deduction              
          for partial worthlessness of a debt may be allowed, certain                  
          requirements must be met.  The taxpayer claiming such a deduction            
          for partial worthlessness generally must have (1) charged off                
          such portion of the debt for that year, and (2) demonstrated to              
          the District Director's satisfaction that such portion of the                
          debt is worthless.  See sec. 1.166-3(a), Income Tax Regs.; Austin            
          Co., Inc. v. Commissioner, 71 T.C. 955, 971 (1979); Findley v.               
          Commissioner, 25 T.C. 311, 318-319 (1955), affd. per curiam 236              
          F.2d 959 (3d Cir. 1956); see also Mayer Tank Manufacturing Co.,              
                                                              (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  454  455  456  457  458  459  460  461  462  463  464  465  466  467  468  469  470  471  472  473  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011