- 465 - claim for partial worthlessness in their pleadings, nor did they seek leave to amend their pleadings to raise the issue. The parties never consented to try such issue during the trial. This alternative argument, therefore, is not properly before the Court. Issue 22. Whether Respondent Correctly Made Adjustments to the Rental Income, Depreciation, Interest Expense, and Investment Tax Credits Claimed by Investment Research Associates, Ltd. (IRA) in Connection with Equipment Leasing Transactions for 1979, 1980, and 1982 Through 1989 FINDINGS OF FACT I. Background and Adjustments Made in Deficiency Notices A. IRA and Cedilla Investment IRA and its subsidiary Cedilla Invest. (hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as IRA) engaged in various equipment leasing transactions involving the sale and leaseback of computer and related equipment beginning in 1976 and continuing through 1987. Although the parties disagree on who owned the various classes of stock in Cedilla Invest., and it appears the stock ownership in Cedilla Invest. varied over the years, the parties agree that for the years at issue, IRA held directly or indirectly at least 80 percent of Cedilla Invest.'s (...continued) Inc. v. Commissioner, 126 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1942), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court. On their 1987 return, the Kanters claimed no bad debt deductions under sec. 166(a)(2) for partial worthlessness of these various promissory notes. Rather, they claimed loss deductions under sec. 165 from their sales of the notes to other parties.Page: Previous 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011