- 11 -
periods: May 31st; June 7th; and June 14, 1991,
representing the total sum of $1,590.00 (@ $530.00).
In addition his check representing the car lease
payment for the month of June, in the sum of $297.10,
has also not been remitted.
The only payment made of late was his check, just
received and without explanation whatsoever, dated
June 7, 1991 and in the sum of $210.00.
* * * * * * *
* * * if the total monies due and owing my client
are not received by her on or before June 20, 1991, I
will, without further notice, seek judicial
intervention and make a formal application to the court
on June 24th. * * *
A second letter that month from Hermine’s to Harvey’s counsel
similarly took the position that Harvey was in arrears with
respect to his obligation to make maintenance and car payments.
Finally, in February 1992, before petitioners’ execution of a
final settlement agreement, Hermine’s counsel sent a letter to
Harvey’s counsel suggesting a need to verify maintenance payments
for the last one-third of 1991.
During 1990 and 1991, Harvey paid $6,724 and $7,471,
respectively, for homeowner’s insurance on the marital home. The
policies listed Hermine as the named insured, and covered the
dwelling as well as certain personal property therein, including
fine art, jewelry, and furs. The remaining amounts stipulated as
for insurance covered life and other insurance.
There was no court decree of divorce or separate maintenance
in effect during 1990 or 1991. A settlement agreement providing
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011