Hermine Leventhal - Page 13




                                        - 13 -                                          
          recipient and deductible by an individual payor in the year paid.             
          See secs. 71(a) and 215(a).                                                   
               Section 71(b)(1) defines “alimony or separate maintenance                
          payment” as:                                                                  
               any payment in cash if--                                                 
                         (A) such payment is received by (or on behalf of)              
                    a spouse under a divorce or separation instrument,                  
                         (B) the divorce or separation instrument does not              
                    designate such payment as a payment which is not                    
                    includible in gross income under this section and not               
                    allowable as a deduction under section 215,                         
                         (C) in the case of an individual legally separated             
                    from his spouse under a decree of divorce or of                     
                    separate maintenance, the payee spouse and the payor                
                    spouse are not members of the same household at the                 
                    time such payment is made, and                                      
                         (D) there is no liability to make any such payment             
                    for any period after the death of the payee spouse and              
                    there is no liability to make any payment (in cash or               
                    property) as a substitute for such payments after the               
                    death of the payee spouse.                                          

               The parties do not dispute that the requirements of section              
          71(b)(1)(B) and (C) are met in the instant case.  The principal               
          dispute concerns section 71(b)(1)(A); while Harvey contends that              
          the amounts in dispute meet the requirements of section                       
          71(b)(1)(A), Hermine and respondent argue that the amounts were               
          not received by or on behalf of Hermine under a divorce or                    
          separation instrument.  In addition, respondent argues that the               
          amounts do not in any event qualify as alimony or separate                    
          maintenance payments because Harvey’s liability for the payments              





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011