- 91 - applications of funds. Accordingly, we find that the source and application of funds analyses for Ronnie and Sylvia should be adjusted to exclude those duplicated expenses. See infra Appendices M and N for the amount of those adjustments. c. Depreciation Ronnie claimed depreciation expenses on his Schedules C for 1989 ($10,350) and 1990 ($700). In Ronnie’s source and application of funds analysis for 1989, respondent reduced applications of funds by the amount of depreciation claimed on his Schedule C, but respondent made no adjustment for depreciation for 1990. See infra Appendices H and I. Respondent did not explain why depreciation was not excluded from applications of funds for 1990. We believe that the adjustment should be made, and accordingly hold that Ronnie’s application of funds analysis for 1990 should be reduced by $700 to account for this item. d. Cash and Jewelry Respondent included $30,000 cash and $100,000 jewelry as applications of funds in the source and application of funds analysis for Frank and Katherine for 1990. See infra Appendix A. Those items constitute the cash and jewelry that Frank and Katherine reported to the police were in their safe when Jack White burglarized their home during 1990. Respondent contends that, if Frank and Katherine did not have the $30,000 cash andPage: Previous 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011